Data Governance

I turn legal requirements (like GDPR) into clear technical rules for your tracking and tracing systems, so you know exactly what customer data you can safely and ethically use. My solutions give clients Confidence, Compliance, and Continuity of Data.

Partner Note: I serve as the specialized implementation resource for legal firms, translating your expert advice into audit-ready tracking infrastructure for your clients.

I. Risk-Based Technical Architecture

High Governance (Low Risk)

• Implementation Focus: I implement strict Consent Mode logic and Data Minimization by Design. I ensure only the absolute minimum necessary data is collected, drastically reducing your legal liability under GDPR principles.'

• Core Risk Mitigation: Maximum Defense against lawsuits and fines.

Balanced Compliance (Optimal Risk)

• Implementation Focus: I utilize Server-Side Tagging (SST) to maintain control and legal oversight of all third-party data transfers. I ensure robust data residency practices and support mandatory Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs).

• Core Risk Mitigation: Industry Standard Defense with optimal data utility.

Data Resilience (Higher Risk)

• Implementation Focus: I implement advanced Lawful Basis Modeling to collect non-consented data where legally permissible. I ensure maximum data resilience, backed by a rigorous audit trail to defend every collection point.

• Core Risk Mitigation: Maximum Data Volume balanced against legal defensibility.

II. Core Technical Governance Deliverables

When you engage my services, I deliver these concrete technical assets:

• Lawful Tagging Rules: I structure all tracking events to map precisely to their specific legal basis, ensuring every collected metric is legally defensible.

• Compliance Audits: I provide technical audit support and certification for all data streams, confirming alignment with the latest EU regulatory requirements.

• Official Documentation: I deliver comprehensive governance documentation and measurement tables that serve as your official, auditable blueprint for every data point collected.

1. Pillar 1: Consent by Design (Transparency & Control)

This is the foundation. It ensures every customer touchpoint is transparent and legally defensible.

• The Problem: Fragile cookies often lose the record of a customer's consent, exposing the business to legal risk (GDPR/CCPA).

• The Solution: We use GTM and Server-Side Tagging (SST) to enforce consent at the server level, not the browser level.

• Key Deliverables (Your 8-Week Actions):

  • Automated Compliance: Integrate a Consent Management Platform (CMP) and Google Consent Mode to dynamically control all tracking tags based on the user's choice.

  • Legally Defensible Records: Configure the Server-Side Data Bridge to check consent status before sending data to marketing platforms, creating an auditable, legally sound process.

  • Honoring User Rights: Establish a clear data path to honor a user's Right to be Forgotten or Right to Access, turning compliance into a controlled operation.

2. Pillar 2: Governance & Standardization

Compliance demands consistency. You bring order to your client's data vocabulary.

• The Problem: Different teams use different definitions for key metrics like "Qualified Lead" or "Converted Customer," leading to conflicting reports and stalled projects.

• The Solution: Implement a Unified Data Layer and Data Minimization rules.

• Key Deliverables:

  • Unified Vocabulary: Define and enforce a single, standardized name and rule for every pipeline-critical event across all systems.

  • Ethical Data Use: Ensure only the necessary data is being collected for specific purposes, reducing the client's risk footprint and promoting ethical practice.

3. Pillar 3: Control & Sovereignty

You pull data control back from third-party browsers and vendors, securing a competitive advantage.

• The Problem: Relying on fragile third-party cookies exposes sensitive customer information (like IP addresses) to vendors, increasing liability and operational risk.

• The Solution: Establish Data Sovereignty using your client's dedicated Server-Side Data Bridge.

• Key Deliverables:

  • Server-Side Shielding: All marketing vendor tags are fired from the secure server, hiding the user's personal IP and identifiers from third parties and reducing liability.

  • Future-Proof Architecture: The client gains full control over data residency and flow, making them resilient against sudden changes in browser privacy rules (like Chrome's eventual phase-out of third-party cookies).

1. Ignoring the Documentation Mandate

The Blunder: Tracking requirements, event names, and legal basis details are undocumented, leading to confusion, failed internal audits, and making compliance defense impossible.

2. Building on Client-Side Sand

The Blunder: Relying solely on old client-side tracking (browser cookies), which are now easily blocked by browsers and ad blockers. This results in immediate data erosion, massive reporting inaccuracies, and wasted ad spend. Over 60% of marketing data is now lost or unreliable due to browser privacy restrictions (like ITP/iOS changes) and ad blockers. 

3. Treating Consent as a Checkbox

The Blunder: Implementing basic Consent Management Platform (CMP) pop-ups but failing to integrate that consent status directly into the data layer and tagging logic (e.g., ignoring Google Consent Mode), leading to non-compliant data collection.  

4. Mixing Business and Legal Logic

The Blunder: Writing complex, business-specific logic (like currency conversion or product ID transformation) directly within the tag management system, making the legal compliance audit unnecessarily difficult and prone to errors.

5. The Tagging Sprawl Nightmare

The Blunder: Allowing every marketing vendor to inject their code directly, leading to tag proliferation, slow site speed, security vulnerabilities, and no central oversight of what data is leaving the domain.

6. No Auditable Data Map

The Blunder: Being unable to quickly and confidently answer the question: "What data is collected, where does it go, and what is its legal justification?" This exposes the company to immediate risk during a regulatory inquiry or audit. 

7. Launching Without Quality Control

The Blunder: Deploying changes without proper testing (relying only on GTM's preview mode), often leading to silent breakage on specific devices or complex user flows. This results in costly data loss that can go unnoticed for weeks.

More